Lovable, Bolt, Cursor, Replit, v0, Claude Code — they get you eighty percent of an app and then stop. We're the engineers who take it the rest of the way: working, secure, deployed, and yours.
~2 minutes · No email required · No commitment
You ask for one change, it rewrites four files, and now two other things are broken. Every fix costs more than the last.
OAuth half-configured, sessions that drop, or a password reset that quietly goes nowhere. Auth is where generated code fails first.
Stripe is connected in test mode, webhooks were never handled, and nobody's certain what happens when a real card is charged.
It runs in the builder and nowhere else. Environment variables, build steps, and domains turn into a wall you cannot get past.
Keys in the frontend, a database anyone can read, no rate limiting. Usually nothing has gone wrong yet — that is not the same as safe.
The happy path demos beautifully. Everything either side of it — errors, empty states, edge cases — was never built.
Nothing tells you when something breaks except a user. Every release is a guess, so releases stop happening.
The structure only made sense to the model that wrote it. A developer opening it now quotes you a rewrite.
Seven questions, about two minutes. No email, and you see the number at the end whether or not you talk to us.
Whatever got you this far — no judgement.
Seven questions, about two minutes, no email. You get a price band and a timeline before you speak to anyone.
Thirty minutes with an engineer who reads the actual code. You leave with a real number and an honest read — including if it's beyond saving.
A written scope with a fixed band and a date. 50% up front, 50% on delivery. No open-ended hourly billing.
A working app deployed to your accounts, the code in your repo, documentation, and a walkthrough call so your team can carry it forward.
We're new to selling this as a productised service, so we're not going to show you testimonials we don't have. What we can show you is how we work when the codebase is someone else's problem to begin with.
Read the deal-system rebuildWe'll tell you on the free audit, before you have paid us anything. Sometimes the honest answer is that rebuilding the core is cheaper than untangling it — and sometimes it is that you do not need us at all.
For the audit, read access to the code is ideal but a screen-share works. For the fix itself we need write access, or you can grant us a fork and take pull requests.
Most of them do export, even when it is not obvious — we can usually help you get the code out. If the platform genuinely locks it in, the honest path is a rebuild, and we will scope it as one rather than pretending otherwise.
You do, entirely. It lives in your repository, deployed to your accounts, under your keys. We keep nothing and we do not resell it.
50% up front, 50% on delivery. Fixed band agreed in writing before we start, so the number does not move while we work.
New feature development beyond the agreed scope, ongoing hosting costs, and third-party subscriptions. If the fix uncovers something bigger, we come back to you with a scope rather than quietly billing for it.
Yes. Plenty of clients start with a fix and move to an ongoing arrangement. It is a separate conversation, and never a condition of the work.
It is a band, not a quote, and it is deliberately wide. It is calculated from your answers using a fixed set of rules — no AI guessing. The audit is what turns it into a real number.
Take the two-minute estimate, or skip it and just talk to us.